Social Media Marketing: Are We Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg?
Email It!
Every advertising professional that you speak to today, is trying to uncover something or the other about Social Media Marketing. For a while now, it has been touted as the ‘next big thing’ in marketing. People have praised it endlessly because of its ability to ‘engage’. It also seems to appear more non intrusive and at the same time, it has the ability to make the user create an action around a brand.
Â
That said: Question – how many users want to create an action around a brand? My guess is – not too many.
Â
The reply would often be: Well there are loads of brands that people have ‘engaged’ with.
Â
Question 2: Accepted, but then would you say that if people have joined a ‘Ferrari Community/ Social Network/ Forum’ – it is because of the brilliant Social Marketing? Or is it because Ferrari has invested a good 50 years in creating a brand? Â
Â
You probably won’t say that its because of the brilliance of Social Media Marketing– and you can’t.
Â
Engagement happens because of liking and liking happens because of synergy of though, a great feeling, a great experience, a great memory. It rarely happens because you send a ‘scrap’ on a social network. Creating ‘engagement’ of the above-mentioned kinds and synergizing that with all marketing is what social media agencies will have to do to really provide any real value. Doing that, is easier said than done.
Â
Currently due to the pressures of the market, social media messengers are focussing on sending out their messages to a greater number of people. As a result of that they are sending out standardized messages to people who are a part of what appears to be a similar psychographic group. The net result is that Social Media Marketing is not becoming any different from direct marketing. It is only sending out the channel through a different communication.
Â
How many mailers sent out by brands do you open?
Â
The great thing about Social Media Marketing is that audiences with similar psychographics are bundled together – eg. They have joined a community on adventure so if the brand is a sports brand with an adventurous identity – it makes sense to send messages to all those members.
Â
That’s where the glitch is. Sending a message is easy. Sending a purposeful message and utilizing that platform for something bigger than the message is extremely, extremely difficult. Also because sending a message is so easy, you have tons of tiny Social Media Shops sending out these standard messages at once (labour in our country is cheap); That, as stated above has 0 value. It’s bordering on spam. Few people are thinking of sending out innovative messages or having a purpose to the message. Even fewer people are thinking if that message has any value at all.
Â
So essentially, because the barriers to entry are so low, and because segmentation is so easy, and because execution is so easy, there really isn’t too much incentive for anyone to think beyond the standard social media communities, personal messages/ scraps, pointless blog comments (you should see the amount of spam we filter in terms of comments). We are thus becoming an industry that is killing itself. In the next 3 months there will be cut throat price competition because noone will look at it as something that delivers value. Social Media Workers will be crudely looked at as ‘vendors’ and the one who delivers the highest numbers at the lowest possible price will be awarded the contract.
Â
Once brands get this mindset – the industry is DEAD. Brands will not undertake social media marketing activities on a long term basis. They will jump agencies from project to project (because in their eyes Social Media Marketing will only be a commodity). So a brand manager will think that he is doing his job well by extracting value for the company but in the end fragmented social media marketing without the existence of a roadmap will do more harm than good.
Â
Ironically, we are mostly in the business of branding. At some level social media agencies are brand stewards – they seem to be forgetting that. Further – they seem to have amnesia when the topic of personal branding comes into the picture.
Â
It’s high time that Social Media Agencies started looking at themselves as Brand Consultants and beyond – even roughing it out for a few months or years before brands start seeing any value. The other concerns such as analytics, ROI, and beyond exist as well – I’ll deal with them at a later date.
Â
Mind you, I believe Social Media Marketing works. It’s really difficult, but it WORKS. Just not the way I see people currently doing it.
Â
PS. Im aware of the fact that there is much more to Social Media Marketing than the standard Outreach. Applications (branded), have showed minimal return. Web Products have a future but that too is out of the reach of many brands, or they are not sure if it is worth creating a product because they have the idea that Social Media Marketing is like magic. Too many marketeers do not want to give themselves time. Ironically, marketeers are not looking to build marketing into products. Plus the Internet is made up of passive consumers. Not everyone has a blog and i’m pretty sure that not many people have the time to create actions around brands. Â






























companies needs to understand that they need to focus on their product too because a google adsense might bring a customer to your site but if ur site provides no utility then that customer would fly away very soon and would never return whereas a perfect product could create free advertisements for a company through word of mouth (the most powerful mean of advertising)…………internet itself is becoming very crowded so to get attention is becoming a very hard …..any medium providing advertisers with very effective advertising would gain popularity……
Harshil,
Fantastic take on social media…while it is new in form it is not new in tactics. We are just finding easier ways of direct marketing that is not door to door (which would suck internationally)…thanks for the post!
In the whole article, you have right;y ruminated about how SMM is killing itself by become a cheap-labour-intensive work.
The article would have been more insightful if you would have made *any* suggestions in how SMM cannot help being a commodity. I have trouble understanding how a SMM agency can strategically deliver power to a brand. As you have pointed out, all I see SMMs doing is scrapping, emailing, commenting, etc. I am yet to come across any example of SMM which does more than this so-called commodity-stuff. Any pointers?
I’m not sure I agree. Social Media is more than generating a ’social network around a brand’. Social Media is relationship marketing and providing a consumer a voice and connection to a company that values transparency. It’s a step up that companies are encouraging this medium rather than hiding behind their PR and Brand. The consequences of transparency can far outweigh the benefits of social media - so it’s great that some companies are incorporating it into their strategy!
the main contribution smm does is creating awareness abt the product a good product without any acknowledgement or introductions is nothing thats where sms come today people have try to experiment any thing and if they like it they recommend it to others…..so smm with good products can provide a repo in the crowded markets…..
Good post Harshil. So good, that i felt i ahd to write a post
http://tinyurl.com/63dd3u do share your views
I think social media marketing is more about expression than definition. Its really has a lot to do with horizontal innovation coupled with short spurts of vertical innovation. At times, i dont even think it should be called marketing. It is fascilitation. Or atleast that’s what it should be. There’s no specific time for social media marketing in my opinion. Its also a lot about authenticity and freedom of expression.
@ Douglas - i completely agree. I stressed on the fact that social media can be used for outreach and engagement as well. Its all about creating platform + using existing platforms. What you seem to be suggesting is more on the lines of CRM. Which is also great for brands. Authenticity is the key as you correctly said.
@ Eric - Thanks a ton!
@ Paras - For Starters:
An SMM agency should understand social media. It should understand why people spend time online. what drives them. They should do a matrix on network/ audience profiles. They should take clients through a process where they educate them about SMM. They should obtain the identity of the brand and then create a strategy that synergizes with the strategy. So they should take money for strategy - not really for execution. Thats when they’ll become brand stewards and social media ’specialists’ rather than vendors.
@ manuscrypts - put a comment on brants!
Great post! Currently I see social media a higher up version of a bpo - many people sitting and building communities, posting with different names. “I need more people” type of a business that is not scalable.
I have yet to see true value being delivered.
I agree with Douglas about the transparency part - blogs have changed that, right.
@ Sahil - do you mean to say that blogs are anti - transparency?
No, it depends on the company and how genuine their blog is - does it really stand to build the relationship with its customers in an honest way.
Though I feel that people are faking a lot of blog comments (in product blogs) to makes the consumer feel that there is a lot of participation. So, blogs in the long run might lose a bit of transparency. Its becoming more of a marketing medium. Eventually, people will see through this.