YouTube Answers To Joe Lieberman’s Letter

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Email It!

 

YouTube

Yesterday we had blogged on how concerned Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman was regarding certain videos on YouTube which showed assassinations, deaths of U.S. soldiers and civilians, weapons training, incendiary speeches by Al-Qaeda leadership, and other material intended to encourage violence against the West.

 

Joe Lieberman

Lieberman had written a letter to YouTube requesting them to remove such videos from their site. Few of the points from the letter are:

 

“Islamist terrorist organizations use YouTube to disseminate their propaganda, enlist followers, and provide weapons training,” the Senator said in his letter. “YouTube also, unwittingly, permits Islamist terrorist groups to maintain an active, pervasive, and amplified voice, despite military setbacks or successful operations by the law enforcement and intelligence communities…

 

 

“Protecting our citizens from terrorist attacks is a top priority for our government. The private sector can help us do that. By taking action to curtail the use of YouTube to disseminate the goals and methods of those who wish to kill innocent civilians, Google will make a singularly important contribution to this important national effort.”

 

 

And much more which can be read here.

 

 

Finally YouTube answers to Lieberman’s letter on their blog. It is as follows

 

 

Last week, Senator Joe Lieberman contacted us to voice his concerns about seeing videos from several Islamic terrorist organizations on YouTube. We appreciated our dialogue with Senator Lieberman and his staff and wanted to explain to the YouTube community how we responded to his concerns.

 

First, some background: hundreds of thousands of videos are uploaded to YouTube every day. Because it is not possible to pre-screen this much content, we have developed an innovative and reliable community policing system that involves our users in helping us enforce YouTube’s standards. Millions of users report potential violations of our Community Guidelines by selecting the “Flag” link while watching videos.

 

Senator Lieberman’s staff identified numerous videos that they believed violated YouTube’s Community Guidelines. In response to his concerns, we examined and ended up removing a number of videos from the site, primarily because they depicted gratuitous violence, advocated violence, or used hate speech. Most of the videos, which did not contain violent or hate speech content, were not removed because they do not violate our Community Guidelines.

 

Senator Lieberman stated his belief, in a letter sent today, that all videos mentioning or featuring these groups should be removed from YouTube — even legal nonviolent or non-hate speech videos. While we respect and understand his views, YouTube encourages free speech and defends everyone’s right to express unpopular points of view. We believe that YouTube is a richer and more relevant platform for users precisely because it hosts a diverse range of views, and rather than stifle debate we allow our users to view all acceptable content and make up their own minds. Of course, users are always free to express their disagreement with a particular video on the site, by leaving comments or their own response video. That debate is healthy.

 

We appreciate Senator Lieberman alerting us to videos that violated our policies — and encourage our users to continue to do the same through the flagging tool. And while we disagree with him about the details of our policies, we respect his views and thank him for giving us the chance to respond to his concerns.

 

 

I certainly agree with YouTube’s point that it is not possible to pre-screen thousands of videos that are being uploaded on YouTube on daily basis. Therefore they have this Flag system. People watching YouTube videos are mature enough to understand and act. It is our responsibility to make Internet space more friendly by reporting abuse any videos or content which are explicit or abusive in nature. Besides that I also agree with YouTube that every one has freedom of speech. And Lieberman’s demand of removing legal nonviolent or non-hate speech videos is unjust. I would like to know your thoughts on this.

Related Posts

About the Author

Rushabh Choksi

Rushabh is our Social Media King, his playmates are Twitter and Pownce and is often found hunting for celebrity gossip for his personal blog. As we write this we are busy trying to figure out why his Gravatar isn't working and trying to keep it from working as well though he doesn't know it yet. Talk to him about social media and Adriana Lima at rushabh [@] watconsult[.]com

One Response to “ YouTube Answers To Joe Lieberman’s Letter ”

  1. there strategy is simple prople keep doing the community service nd get more views for youtube….just like banning communities feature in orkut so that people are glued to their site….keep up da good work….shud i say marketing tactics

Leave a Comment and Follow the replies through Post Comment Feed

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>