<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guruji.com to follow Guru Google&#8217;s Adwords Model!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watblog.com/2007/12/14/gurujicom-to-follow-guru-googles-adwords-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/12/14/gurujicom-to-follow-guru-googles-adwords-model/</link>
	<description>The Refreshing Blog on Web, Advertising and Technology in India!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tss</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/12/14/gurujicom-to-follow-guru-googles-adwords-model/#comment-2410</link>
		<dc:creator>tss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watblog.com/2007/12/14/gurujicom-to-follow-guru-googles-adwords-model/#comment-2410</guid>
		<description>joot.in is another search engine for Indian cities. It uses google's adsense for advertising. The search results are displayed in a clustered format similar to clusty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joot.in is another search engine for Indian cities. It uses google&#8217;s adsense for advertising. The search results are displayed in a clustered format similar to clusty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Venkatraman</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/12/14/gurujicom-to-follow-guru-googles-adwords-model/#comment-2261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Venkatraman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watblog.com/2007/12/14/gurujicom-to-follow-guru-googles-adwords-model/#comment-2261</guid>
		<description>They would have to license the use of technology from Yahoo.(Yahoo/Overture holds the patent)
Even google had to pay yahoo for the implementing the contextual ads.
Overture Services, Inc. sued Google for patent infringement in April 2002 in relation to the AdWords service. Following Yahoo!’s acquisition of Overture, the suit was settled in 2004 with Google agreeing to issue 2.7 million shares of common stock to Yahoo! in exchange for a perpetual license under the patent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would have to license the use of technology from Yahoo.(Yahoo/Overture holds the patent)<br />
Even google had to pay yahoo for the implementing the contextual ads.<br />
Overture Services, Inc. sued Google for patent infringement in April 2002 in relation to the AdWords service. Following Yahoo!’s acquisition of Overture, the suit was settled in 2004 with Google agreeing to issue 2.7 million shares of common stock to Yahoo! in exchange for a perpetual license under the patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
