<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZapakTV launches Maxim Channel.. Sexy.. Hot.. or Sleazy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/</link>
	<description>The Refreshing Blog on Web, Advertising and Technology in India!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: poseidon</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>poseidon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-872</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now to answer the question whether Maxim Channel on zapak is sexy, hot or sleazy.. well according to me if it zapaktv was a seperate property which was not associated with the zapak brand (which in my mind still stands fo gaming) then it would have been a great move but as this is being all served under one brand somewhere to me this borders on sleazy content to drive traffic from a young audience&quot;

Pretty long sentence dude. i got lost in between..#!

Yeah Mallika rocks! probably gave me reason to look at zapak :$ . Yeah, sex sells like anything,and i think youtube used the same strategy to gain popularity.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Now to answer the question whether Maxim Channel on zapak is sexy, hot or sleazy.. well according to me if it zapaktv was a seperate property which was not associated with the zapak brand (which in my mind still stands fo gaming) then it would have been a great move but as this is being all served under one brand somewhere to me this borders on sleazy content to drive traffic from a young audience&quot;</p>
<p>Pretty long sentence dude. i got lost in between..#!</p>
<p>Yeah Mallika rocks! probably gave me reason to look at zapak :$ . Yeah, sex sells like anything,and i think youtube used the same strategy to gain popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajiv Dingra</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Dingra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-871</guid>
		<description>@Aditya  - I agree there are magazines on the stands but they cost money.. also zapak is a gaming brand with a constant flow of kids coming there. If i had to compare this move to the offline world this is the same as selling huge maxim posters and magazine in a kids toy store. Tell me would you take your kid to this shop? Well as i said it really depends on moral sensibilities but according to me leveraging risque content to attract young audiences is pretty sleazy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aditya  &#8211; I agree there are magazines on the stands but they cost money.. also zapak is a gaming brand with a constant flow of kids coming there. If i had to compare this move to the offline world this is the same as selling huge maxim posters and magazine in a kids toy store. Tell me would you take your kid to this shop? Well as i said it really depends on moral sensibilities but according to me leveraging risque content to attract young audiences is pretty sleazy <img src='http://www.watblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ekalavya</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Ekalavya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-870</guid>
		<description>http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1521

Worldwide Online Gaming Community reaches 217 million!!! Thats almost 10 times india&#039;s total online population (Which comscore put at 22 million. Indian gaming is mostly around the 1million mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1521" rel="nofollow">http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1521</a></p>
<p>Worldwide Online Gaming Community reaches 217 million!!! Thats almost 10 times india&#039;s total online population (Which comscore put at 22 million. Indian gaming is mostly around the 1million mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ekalavya</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ekalavya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-869</guid>
		<description>I just had to add this
 (H) 
The maxim issue carrying the mallika shoot was definitely a collectors piece!

Btw...there were talks of Bipasha or Katrina Kaif joining as a Zapak ambassador...with Bipasha ads of Reliance Mobile appearing - i guess she would be endorsing Zapak stuff too. Wonder what Malaika Arora @ ZapakGirls is up to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to add this<br />
 (H)<br />
The maxim issue carrying the mallika shoot was definitely a collectors piece!</p>
<p>Btw&#8230;there were talks of Bipasha or Katrina Kaif joining as a Zapak ambassador&#8230;with Bipasha ads of Reliance Mobile appearing &#8211; i guess she would be endorsing Zapak stuff too. Wonder what Malaika Arora @ ZapakGirls is up to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya Kuber</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/07/10/zapaktv-launches-maxim-channel-sexy-hot-or-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya Kuber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-868</guid>
		<description>Um, if Maxim can use a similar pic on their cover, why can&#039;t Zapak? It is sad that print mags get away with such photos and sites cannot. I see nothing wrong in using such a photo for promotion. 
That apart, I also agree with you that they are trying too many things too soon and not getting most right. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, if Maxim can use a similar pic on their cover, why can&#039;t Zapak? It is sad that print mags get away with such photos and sites cannot. I see nothing wrong in using such a photo for promotion.<br />
That apart, I also agree with you that they are trying too many things too soon and not getting most right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

