<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media&#8217;s Perspective on web2.0.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watblog.com/2007/06/26/media-perspective-web2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/06/26/media-perspective-web2-0/</link>
	<description>The Refreshing Blog on Web, Advertising and Technology in India!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Priya S</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/06/26/media-perspective-web2-0/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753</guid>
		<description>@Roy: I do agree that Social Bookmarking has space for manipulation and there is no denying that. Absolute Transparency though required, im not sure if it is possible.

@john : Mainstream Media being powerful due to its quality and the authenticity of the content is questionable. Check this link out ---&#62; http://www.watblog.com/?content=detail&#38;id=801.  and do let me know  :)) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roy: I do agree that Social Bookmarking has space for manipulation and there is no denying that. Absolute Transparency though required, im not sure if it is possible.</p>
<p>@john : Mainstream Media being powerful due to its quality and the authenticity of the content is questionable. Check this link out &#8212;&gt; <a href="http://www.watblog.com/?content=detail&amp;id=801" rel="nofollow">http://www.watblog.com/?content=detail&amp;id=801</a>.  and do let me know  :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/06/26/media-perspective-web2-0/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>John Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752</guid>
		<description>we could hardly see any individuals contributing good content. The mainstream media is still powerful becuase of quality and the authenticity of the content.

http://mjpeter.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we could hardly see any individuals contributing good content. The mainstream media is still powerful becuase of quality and the authenticity of the content.</p>
<p><a href="http://mjpeter.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mjpeter.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy </title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2007/06/26/media-perspective-web2-0/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-751</guid>
		<description>I recently read a blog entry about how Digg and such sites some times manipulated the whole deal and i feel that there is some point to the whole deal. Because if you look at the stories on the popular ones they are things that you actually see on the old media itself you dont see anything other than that. Also to be seen is the fact that the one maintaining such sites have all possibilities to manipulate stories to come on top. I myself have noticed that some peoples stories on digg coming to front page faster. Being a person who spents a lot of time on DIGG i have had the chance to notice this. The Dynamics of social News systems seem to be actually being monitored and manipulated. So there need to be a more transparent system than the once existing that will make sure no intervention or manipulation of data 
This is the blog entry :- http://indiainteresting.blogspot.com/2007/05/user-rated-news-major-turns-racist.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read a blog entry about how Digg and such sites some times manipulated the whole deal and i feel that there is some point to the whole deal. Because if you look at the stories on the popular ones they are things that you actually see on the old media itself you dont see anything other than that. Also to be seen is the fact that the one maintaining such sites have all possibilities to manipulate stories to come on top. I myself have noticed that some peoples stories on digg coming to front page faster. Being a person who spents a lot of time on DIGG i have had the chance to notice this. The Dynamics of social News systems seem to be actually being monitored and manipulated. So there need to be a more transparent system than the once existing that will make sure no intervention or manipulation of data<br />
This is the blog entry :- <a href="http://indiainteresting.blogspot.com/2007/05/user-rated-news-major-turns-racist.html" rel="nofollow">http://indiainteresting.blogspot.com/2007/05/user-rated-news-major-turns-racist.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
