<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Johnson n Johnson lauch microsite on Rediff.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watblog.com/2006/06/29/johnson-n-johnson-lauch-microsite-rediff-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watblog.com/2006/06/29/johnson-n-johnson-lauch-microsite-rediff-com/</link>
	<description>The Refreshing Blog on Web, Advertising and Technology in India!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: indian moms</title>
		<link>http://www.watblog.com/2006/06/29/johnson-n-johnson-lauch-microsite-rediff-com/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>indian moms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>J and J within rediff is fine - it will bring  traffic. Nothing to be puzzled, they probably have a good budget. 
By the way, J and J also owns babycenter.in ( for Indian audience )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J and J within rediff is fine - it will bring  traffic. Nothing to be puzzled, they probably have a good budget.<br />
By the way, J and J also owns babycenter.in ( for Indian audience )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
